Apologetics and AI

What would AI do?

As an Apologist I have to say that Artificial Intelligence is based solely upon the knowledge that is only presented from the minds of humankind. It can be considered as evil as man is, and by asking it questions to certain topics you can see that it is biased towards the "truths" that man has stated as truths 

I asked it some Questions.

What is a Moral Standard
AI RESPONSE: 

A moral standard is a set of principles or criteria that are used to judge and evaluate what is considered right or wrong in a given society or ethical framework. These standards serve as guidelines for individuals and communities to make moral judgments and decisions about their actions and behaviors.

Moral standards can vary significantly from one culture, religion, or philosophical perspective to another. They often reflect the values, beliefs, and norms of a particular group or society. These standards provide a basis for individuals to assess the morality of their actions and to determine whether they are in accordance with the accepted principles of their community or belief system.

Examples of moral standards include concepts such as honesty, integrity, fairness, compassion, respect for others, and the prohibition of actions like lying, stealing, and harming others. Different cultures and ethical philosophies may prioritize these standards differently and may have their own unique moral codes.

It's important to note that moral standards are not universally agreed upon, and ethical dilemmas can arise when different individuals or groups have conflicting moral beliefs or standards. These differences in moral standards can lead to debates and discussions about what is morally right or wrong in various situations.

This prompted me to ask a follow-up question. 

Isn't a Moral Standard considered unchanging? and if so why would it be different between communities?

AI RESPONSE: 

Moral standards are not necessarily unchanging, and whether they are considered to be fixed or subject to change can vary depending on one's ethical perspective and cultural context. Here are some key points to consider:

1. Objective vs. Subjective Morality: Some people believe in objective moral standards, which means that certain moral principles are believed to be universal and unchanging, regardless of cultural or individual differences. These objective moral standards are often thought to be based on absolute moral truths or a divine source. In contrast, subjective morality suggests that moral standards are relative and can vary from one culture or individual to another.

2. Cultural Relativism: Cultural relativism is the idea that moral standards are culturally specific and can differ from one society to another. In this view, what is considered morally right or wrong is determined by the cultural norms and values of a particular community. Cultural relativism suggests that moral standards can indeed change over time and vary between different communities.

3. Moral Realism: Moral realists argue that there are objective moral facts that exist independently of human beliefs. While they believe in objective moral standards, they acknowledge that human understanding and interpretations of these standards can evolve and vary across cultures.

4. Moral Progress: Some ethical theories, such as utilitarianism and human rights theories, suggest that moral progress can occur over time. This implies that societies can evolve and improve their moral standards by recognizing and rectifying past injustices and adopting more ethical practices.

In practice, there are often significant variations in moral standards between different communities, cultures, and historical periods. These differences can be attributed to various factors, including cultural traditions, religious beliefs, historical context, and societal norms. While some moral principles may be nearly universal (e.g., prohibitions against murder or theft), the interpretation and application of these principles can still differ significantly.

So, whether moral standards are considered unchanging or subject to change depends on one's philosophical and cultural perspective. Different individuals and communities may hold varying views on the nature of morality and the stability of moral standards.

These two answers show that AI considers that Mankind's answer is correct and that any theological answer boils down to philosophical or cultural perspectives. So I asked the following question. 

Are your answers predicated on only mankind's collective agreement of what is truth?

AI RESPONSE: 

My responses are based on a combination of factors, including:

1. Human Understanding: I draw from the collective knowledge and understanding of humanity as of my last training data in September 2021. This includes widely accepted concepts, principles, and beliefs about various subjects, including morality and ethics.

2. Philosophical Perspectives: I provide information on different philosophical perspectives and debates related to topics like morality. These perspectives include views that consider morality to be objective and unchanging, as well as those that view it as subjective and culturally relative.

3. Cultural and Historical Context: I take into account that moral standards and beliefs can vary across cultures and historical periods. I aim to provide a well-rounded understanding of how different societies and eras have approached moral questions.

4. OpenAI's Guidelines: I adhere to OpenAI's guidelines, which include a commitment to providing balanced and informative responses that reflect a range of perspectives and avoid taking a position on controversial or philosophical matters.

It's important to note that while I can provide information on various perspectives and the consensus of human knowledge up to my last training data, I do not possess personal beliefs or opinions. My responses are generated based on patterns in the text data I was trained on, and I aim to provide information that can help users understand and consider different viewpoints on a given topic. Ultimately, questions related to truth, morality, and ethics often involve complex and multifaceted discussions, and my responses are intended to contribute to those discussions rather than dictate a particular viewpoint.

As you can see the answer is based a lot on the wording of the question and you can also spin the answers to your own bias if you would like, by adding what context you would like the answer to contain. The conversation could go on and on with AI. but as you can see the primary basis is on "text data I was trained on". Which of course means that it probably has no opinion one way or another but is a collective answer of the majority of text data AI is exposed to. 

Do I trust it? I am unsure, but let me ask it. 

Can I trust your Answers?

AI RESPONSE:

While I strive to provide accurate and informative answers, it's essential to remember that I am a computer program developed by OpenAI, and my responses are generated based on patterns in the text data I was trained on. Here are some considerations when using my responses:

1. Informational Purposes: My responses are intended for informational purposes and should not be considered as a sole source of authority. It's always a good practice to cross-reference information from multiple sources, especially for critical or important decisions.

2. Knowledge Cutoff: My knowledge is based on the data available up to my last training in September 2021. I do not have access to real-time information or events that occurred after that date.

3. No Personal Beliefs: I do not have personal beliefs, opinions, or emotions. My responses are generated algorithmically based on the text inputs I receive and the patterns in the data I was trained on.

4. Consider Diverse Perspectives: I aim to provide balanced and informative responses that reflect a range of viewpoints on various topics. However, I do not endorse any particular perspective or agenda.

5. Critical Thinking: It's important to engage in critical thinking and independent research when making decisions or forming opinions. My responses can serve as a starting point for exploration but should not replace thoughtful analysis and inquiry.

Ultimately, the trustworthiness of my answers depends on the context and the reliability of the information available up to my last training data. For important matters, especially those involving legal, medical, or personal decisions, consulting experts or reputable sources is advisable.

There you have it....the vague answer based on the text it has been trained on and if you want real answers it advises to go to other experts.