Thursday, April 14, 2022

Evolution Asserts a Scientifically UNACCEPTED result

 Nothing + Time + the Impersonal + Space + Chance = Everything

Ummm NO!

"Many current research articles specify an alpha of 0.05 for their significance level. It can not be stated strongly enough that there is nothing special, mathematical, or certain about picking an alpha of 0.05. Historically, the originators concluded that for many applications, an alpha of 0.05 or a one in 20 chance of being incorrect was good enough. It is imperative for the researcher to consider what their confidence level should truly be for the research question they are asking. Many times a smaller alpha, say of 0.01, may be more appropriate." - National Library of Medicine (National Center for Biotechnology Information) - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK459346/ 

This indicates that in order for the scientific acceptance to be made it has to be proven within an alpha of .05 (99.95%) HOWEVER, this section indicates that it should be proven even further to an alpha of .01 (99.99%)

Meaning that in order for it to be accepted as a scientifically proven it has to be ALMOST 100% or only off by .01%

but the evolutionary theory asserts that from nothing a puddle of goo shows up, and given enough time, and space, along with the probability of 10 to the 40th power (this is the CHANCE) everything on Earth was made. This also presupposes that the Earth already exists and has no explanation for that except the Big Bang Theory which States that Space and all Stars and Planets were created instantaneously. 

So the chance is 10 to the 40th power which is a 1 in 10 to 40 zeros chance of a single cell forming, and in order to form more complex cellular structures the odds would be 10 to the 140th power. 

Seems like this would NEVER EVER be scientifically accepted!

Tuesday, April 12, 2022

My Apologetic Reading List

 Over the Past year I have been reading a lot of books, some have them have been assigned from my Classes and others I have found interesting because of their reference and as part of my personal desire to increase my knowledge.

Here is a List that I have. 

Current Reading

  • The Bible, KJV I started last year around my Birthday reading the Bible cover to Cover and am currently in Ezekiel. 
  • Tactics, Gregory, Book Link
  • Evidence that Demands a Verdict, Josh McDowell, & Sean Mcdowell, Book Link
  • PRESUPPOSITIONAL CONFRONTATIONS, Vincent, Cheung, (no Link), Part of Apologetics I Class for my Th.D. Studies
Already Read
  • Cold Case Christianity, J. Warner Wallace, Book Link 
  • Twelve Ordinary Men, John McArthur, Book Link
  • Becoming a Soldier of Christ, Sean Beaton, Book Link
  • A Journey through the Old Testament, Elmer L. Towns
  • Introduction to the New Testament, Louis Berkhof 
  • HOW TO STUDY AND TEACH THE BIBLE, Elmer L. Towns
  • Sacred Hermeneutics, Study book part of Hermeneutics I, Class for my Th.D. Studies
  • A Foundation for Faith A n Introductory Study of Systematic Theology With References To The Baptist Confession of Faith of 1689, Stanford E. Murrell, Th.D

The Unheard Message: What about People Who Never Hear of the Salvation Offered by Jesus Christ?

As a Doctor of Christian Apologetics, I often encounter thought-provoking questions that challenge the core tenets of the Christian faith. O...